翻訳と辞書 |
Canadian Western Bank v Alberta : ウィキペディア英語版 | Canadian Western Bank v Alberta
''Canadian Western Bank v Alberta'' () 2 S.C.R. 3 is a landmark decision in Canadian constitutional law by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) relating to the division of powers between Federal and Provincial legislative bodies. ==Background== In 2000, Alberta enacted changes to its ''Insurance Act'' purporting to make federally chartered banks subject to the provincial licensing scheme governing the promotion of insurance products. Upon the coming into force of that Act, the Bank, together with other chartered banks, brought an application for a declaration: * that their promotion of certain insurance products authorized by the ''Bank Act'' was banking within the meaning of s. 91(15) of the ''Constitution Act, 1867'', and * that the ''Insurance Act'' and its associated regulations were constitutionally inapplicable to the banks’ promotion of insurance by virtue of the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity or, alternatively, inoperative by virtue of the doctrine of federal paramountcy.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Canadian Western Bank v Alberta」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|